Kerala Elephant Killing - VISION

Material For Exam

Recent Update

Saturday, June 06, 2020

Kerala Elephant Killing

Why in news?
A pregnant elephant in Kerala died due to the treacherous use of a food bomb by the locals.
What happened?
  • Many elephants are killed every year in India as their paths cross those of humans.
  • But the image of a mortally wounded animal standing impassively in a river in Palakkad as life ebbed out of it will remain in our mind.
  • Whether the booby-trapped pineapple that took the life of elephant was intended for elephants or other animals matters little.
  • Because such traps litter the troubled landscapes that surround forests across the country.
  • The perpetrators may be prosecuted for the elephant’s death.
  • But this can do little to mitigate the larger issue of lost ranges and blocked corridors for these wandering giants.
What does this incident remind us?
  • The tragic fate that occurred to this creature is a reminder of the rising human-animal conflicts.
  • These conflicts are only destined to grow, as commercial pressures eat into already diminished habitat.
  • India has just under 30,000 elephants but no strong science-imbued policy that encourages soft landscapes and migrating passages that will reduce conflict.
  • It is the lack of a scientific culture and the readiness to spare forested lands from commercial exploitation.
What are the reasons for conflict?
  • Shrinking ranges and feeding grounds for elephants cause serious worry, because the animals look for soft landscapes adjoining forests such as coffee, tea and cardamom estates.
  • In the absence of these soft landscapes, they wander into food-rich farms falling in their movement pathways.
  • Research in Karnataka showed that 60% of elephant distribution was encountered outside protected areas.
  • In Kerala, such movement along human-dominated landscapes routinely produces conflict.
  • Politicians in the State were opposed to the Madhav Gadgil Committee Report calling for the Western Ghats to be classified as ecologically sensitive and spared of destructive development.
  • With such fundamental philosophical disagreement, and a vision of lush landscapes as just a resource to be exploited, animals have little chance of escaping deadly conflict.
What is needed?
  • A sensible course open to conservation-minded governments is to end all intrusion into the 5% of protected habitat in India.
  • The governments must draw up better compensation schemes for farmers who lose crops to animals.
  • A culture shift to protect would genuinely enrich people and save biodiversity.

Source: The Hindu